EXAMINATION PERFORMANCE OF OPHTHALMIC ASSISTANTS USING RUBRICS FOR EXAMINATION PREPARATION

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of clinical skills rubrics on the Certified Ophthalmic Assistant (COA) examination performance. Based on constructivist learning theory, it hypothesized there would be no difference in the mean score and pass rate between the examination candidates provided with clinical skills rubrics and those not. This quantitative correlational study compared candidates from 2023 who had rubrics (n=397) with candidates from 2022 who did not (n=406). A limitation was the inability to determine how many 2023 candidates used the rubrics. Results showed no significant differences, supporting the hypothesis that rubrics had a neutral effect. Despite this, the study highlighted the importance of standardized assessments and suggested further research. Recommendations include using mixed methods for qualitative feedback, analyzing specific content areas, and controlling variables using the same timeframe for all groups. These steps could enhance understanding of rubrics' effectiveness and refine training strategies for ophthalmic assistants.